After the announcement from Umbraco team that V5 was ripped off, we were left with version 4.7 which is latest version we could have at the point of this post is published.
we were not left with much options . so we went ahead with what we have & utilised MVCBridge package installer which gives a way to create a page in Umbraco & give the controller , action names to the call. with this we were able to integrate our existing MVC webapp in to Umbraco ..
We thought issue was resolved , how ever we boggled down with Ajax Calls, then we went ahead and modified the source code of MVCBridge to make ajax calls with just Controller , Action as we don't have access to HTMLHelper classes & used the Umbraco /base ajax calls with parameters controller & action which will then make a call to routine call from MVCBridge. Even though we don't have helper class to pass parameters still we can pass parameters to ajax /base class as they will be available in Context object for MVC call.
Hope this helps ..
we were not left with much options . so we went ahead with what we have & utilised MVCBridge package installer which gives a way to create a page in Umbraco & give the controller , action names to the call. with this we were able to integrate our existing MVC webapp in to Umbraco ..
We thought issue was resolved , how ever we boggled down with Ajax Calls, then we went ahead and modified the source code of MVCBridge to make ajax calls with just Controller , Action as we don't have access to HTMLHelper classes & used the Umbraco /base ajax calls with parameters controller & action which will then make a call to routine call from MVCBridge. Even though we don't have helper class to pass parameters still we can pass parameters to ajax /base class as they will be available in Context object for MVC call.
Hope this helps ..
No comments:
Post a Comment